Nuclear war in the 19th century

After the release of the film, "Apocalypse of the 19th century.
A true story of genocide" (https://bit.ly/3fQlShW), there were
a lot of questions. Let's start with the first and simplest question.
The fact that it was Africa that struck at the modern territories
of Siberia and North America. This has been known for a long
time, and studies of recent years have only confirmed this version
each time, revealing new data, for example, that Africa had
Australia as an ally. According to the classification of reserves
of uranium deposits by the IAEA, developed in 1988-1989,
a special gradation of uranium deposits was adopted. In addition
to all other parameters, this gradation takes into account the
spectrum and radiation power of uranium ore from each specific
deposit. That is, what is important for us to know is that each
uranium deposit has its own unique radiation, respectively, the
uranium mined from it also has this unique trace. The radioactive
footprint for each deposit is as unique as the fingerprint for each
person. Here is the "Map of distribution of uranium deposits
of the world, from the IAEA Bulletin for 2018"
(https://bit.ly/3Cl0yIS):
The very first clear fact indicating that it was Africa and Australia
that launched a nuclear strike is the presence of traces of African
uranium in North America, and in Siberia of African and even
Australian uranium. The second fact confirming a nuclear strike
from Africa is the so-called "scattering ellipse", directed to the
south. What is an ellipse of dispersion is explained in detail in
the film "Who Destroyed Tartaria?" (https://bit.ly/3RHNa7j).
According to the accuracy and mutual arrangement of the funnels,
it is possible to determine the direction from which the charge
arrived. In artillery, aviation and missile forces, there is such
a thing as a "scattering ellipse", that is, when several charges are
launched from one specific point, at one specific target, some
of these charges will fall near the target, while the greater the
firing range , the greater the deviation.
Focusing on the ellipse of dispersion, you can quite accurately
determine the direction from which the shot was fired. So, the
azimuth of scattering ellipses in Siberia is directed to the south,
or more precisely, to Africa and Australia, this is easy to verify
by just looking carefully at the map. These two direct facts alone
are sufficient to conclude that the nuclear strike was delivered
by Africa and Australia. To explain the dating of events, we will
use physics and mathematics in relation to round lakes, or rather,
to their diameter. All these and many other versions of the
formation of round lakes are known to me, and moreover, I do
not deny that they are possible. But, about how and in what way
round lakes differ from each other, which of them are meteorite
and which are karst failures, all this is explained in great detail
in the article "Caesium-137 in the Ryazan land"
(https://bit.ly/3eledHV). We proceed from the fact that Cesium-137
is a man-made product and is formed only during the nuclear decay
of Uranium or Plutonium, therefore the very presence of Cesium-137
is a fact confirming nuclear decay in this place.
Given initial data, such as the diameter of the funnel and the amount
of Cesium-137 in our time, one can easily calculate the date
of a nuclear explosion. We will carry out the calculation using the
example of object No. 7, Svyatoye Lake, Ryazan Region. Its diameter
is just 357-360 meters. The first thing we need to know is how much
Cesium-137 was formed right after this explosion. The total amount
of decay products resulting from a nuclear explosion is always
directly proportional to the amount of Uranium-235 that has reacted.
Compiling the simplest proportion, we get that during the explosion
of object No. 7 in the Ryazan region, 39 kg of Uranium-235 entered
into the reaction. Therefore, the total mass of the resulting
substances should also be 39 kg. To calculate, we translate the mass
of the reacted Uranium-235 into the molar amount of the substance:
It turns out 165.48 mol. Which gives us 22670.76 grams of Cesium-137
and 15886 grams of Iodine-96, or the same 39 kg of the total mass
of the reacted substance. Thus, we learned that in an explosion with
a power of 1 Mt, 22670.76 grams of Cesium-137 were formed.
According to the results of laboratory studies of soil samples taken
at facility No. 7, it is known that in our time the activity of
Cesium-137 in the soil of Lake Svyatoye is 3.0 Bq / kg (Becquerel
per kilogram), which approximately corresponds to 350 grams
of Cesium-137 in calculated on the total weight. The half-life
of Cesium-137 is just over 30 years. Every 30 years, the amount
of cesium will be halved. Thus, if we count by the number of
half-lives in the opposite direction, then for 22670.76 grams of
Cesium-137 immediately after the explosion, we get 354.27 grams
of Cesium-137 in our time and 6 full half-lives, or 180 years.
The allowable calculation error is 10-20 years, in both directions,
since for more accurate dating, you need to take more samples from
different depths and conduct research with more accurate instruments,
however, even such approximate calculations are enough to understand
that neither what hundreds and even more thousands of years is out
of the question.